It is YOUR right to receive your intervention services in your home, in the daycare setting or in the
agency itself. The services usually begin one-on-one and eventually expand to allow the child interaction with peers. I really dislike the idea of 3 hours of therapy with only one adult in a small room each day. While it seems like the one-on-one attention would be great, it really detracts from the incidental teaching and peer interaction I believe our children really need. There are times for one-on-one therapy. I know that. I just do not believe it is in the child's best interest to receive that model of therapy for 15 or more hours a week. By the way, did you know that research states our children need 40 hours of therapy per week?
You have only ONE choice of therapy model and that is therapy guided by the principals of ABA or applied behavior analysis which as far as I can tell, locally anyway, results in a lot of IBI (intensive behavioral intervention) in the form of discrete trial training (DDT). I have taken ABA training offered by the University and I have been vocal about my issues with the lack of choice and the dangers of not varying treatment options. (Call your local agency to ask about their philosophy in terms of ABA therapy.) We would never have chosen ABA for Kate. We have a real problem with discrete trial teaching and we feel strongly that is not the right path for Kate. I can't stand the thought of her sitting in a room with an ASW and being asked to "touch orange" over and over so they can collect data to prove you she knows the colour orange. Here is a better way to teach Kate orange. Show her orange in a real world setting, a setting that is interesting to her. Follow her lead and help her learn orange the way you and I did. Naturally. DO NOT ASSUME that these children can not learn in their natural environments among their peers. We desperately wish we had some input in this decision. I have posted a few video example of Discrete Trial Training at the bottom of this post. It makes me ill but that is just my opinion. It might be right for you. You decide. Below those, I have posted some video information about therapies I would like access to. Again, you can decide how you feel.
At this point, Kate is receiving therapy in her daycare (because we firmly believe that a natural setting makes more sense than an artificially constructed one) and we have made the best of what the province has to offer. We have asked her clinical supervisor to REMOVE the discrete trials as we feel strongly that they are NOT the best option for Kate. Here is a link to some research to that effect.
Within the scope of the principals of ABA there is a therapy called Pivotal Response which is highlighted in the article. It is not our ideal choice, with so many other excellent therapies
available (Floor-Time, Son-Rise, Scerts, Hanen etc), but it is more naturally occurring and authentic than DTT and we have asked that Kate receive Pivotal Response Treatment or Incidental Teaching in place of DTT. You also have the right to ask that your child be treated this way too, but I will leave that up to you and your team.
Each time I ask for more varied or more current and progressive therapy options for Kate I am reminded that NB is a leader in autism services. I believe that over a decade ago many amazing parents, therapists and doctors fought tooth and nail to bring us this far. I am just asking to keep the progress moving. See below for examples of DDT (which we do not approve of) and below that I have included other more progressive forms of therapy.